Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40628844›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Development of a novel quantitative lateral flow assay for vancomycin for therapeutic drug monitoring.

Alaa Riezk, Vasin Vasikasin, Richard C Wilson, Timothy M Rawson, Anthony E G Cass, Alison H Holmes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alaa RiezkCentre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Vasin VasikasinCentre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Richard C WilsonCentre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Timothy M RawsonCentre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Anthony E G CassCentre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Alison H HolmesCentre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Imperial College London, London, UK. alison.holmes@imperial.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibiotic optimisation through therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a key strategy in tackling antimicrobial resistance. However, current quantification methods rely on laboratory-based equipment, delaying timely dose adjustments. We developed a novel point-of-care lateral flow assay (LFA) for the quantification of vancomycin in serum. Unlike conventional LFAs with a single test and control line, this assay incorporates two test lines: one for vancomycin binding and one for avidin capture of excess conjugate. Gold nanoparticles were conjugated to biotinylated bovine serum albumin-vancomycin, enabling competitive binding with anti-vancomycin antibodies and avidin capture. Signal ratios from smartphone-acquired images were quantified using an automated image analysis algorithm. Applied to vancomycin in serum, the LFA demonstrated a quantitative detection range of 2.88 to 45,000 ng/mL, with good accuracy, reproducibility, and high recovery in spiked samples. This approach offers a promising solution for decentralised, rapid TDM in clinical settings, especially where timely dose optimisation is critical.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDrug MonitoringVancomycinGoldHumansMetal NanoparticlesPoint-of-Care SystemsReproducibility of ResultsSerum Albumin, BovineAnti-Bacterial AgentsGoldSerum Albumin, BovineVancomycinLateral flow assayPoint of careTherapeutic drug monitoringVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID40628844
PMCPMC12238248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.