ArticleScientific reports2025
Factors influencing bacterial viability on face masks and bactericidal effect of disinfection methods.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Face masks are contaminated with bacteria during daily use and storage. Several studies have already been conducted on face mask decontamination and bacterial survival during the pandemic. However, there are limited reports on methods of decontamination that can be implemented in daily life. In this study, we inoculated commercially available nonwoven face masks with Staphylococcus aureus and/or Staphylococcus epidermidis which are the main indigenous bacteria of human skin to obtain knowledge on the prevention of bacterial infection when wearing face masks in daily life, and investigated factors affecting bacterial viability on face masks and the bactericidal effect of different disinfection methods. Commercially available face masks were inoculated with two bacterial species and the effects of temperature, humidity, washing, contamination (sweat, sebum, saliva, protein, and cosmetics), and initial bacterial count and density on the viability of adherent bacteria were examined. After each bacterium was collected from the face mask, colonies were measured by the agar plate dilution method and the number of viable colonies. Various experiments were also performed to determine how to disinfect bacteria on face masks. Bacterial survival of face masks increased in the presence of artificial saliva and 1% peptone. By sealing the face mask after 70% ethanol spraying, the number of bacteria was reduced by 6 log order of magnitude and no colonies were detected. However, the presence of contaminants on the face mask weakened the bactericidal effect. Furthermore, direct exposure of the face masks to sunlight was suggested as a useful method for bacterial disinfection. Our findings revealed factors affecting bacterial viability on face masks, providing data that can be applied for the effective household disinfection of face masks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.