Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40628805›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Congruence between noise and plasticity in protein expression.

Saburo Tsuru, Chikara Furusawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Saburo TsuruUniversal Biology Institute, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan. tsuru@ubi.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
Chikara FurusawaUniversal Biology Institute, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan. chikara.furusawa@riken.jp.

Funding

Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) ERATO JPMJER1902Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 17H06389Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 18H02427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene expression responds to various types of perturbations, such as mutations, environmental changes, and stochastic molecular noises. These different types of variability are often interdependent, where genes sensitive to one perturbation tend to be sensitive to others. However, the relationship between plasticity (variability in response to environmental changes) and noise (variability among cells under the same conditions) in gene expression remains debatable. Previous studies predicted a positive correlation between plasticity and noise in nonessential genes, but these were often measured at different levels: plasticity at the mRNA level and noise at the protein level. This methodological discrepancy complicates the understanding of their relationship. We addressed this by measuring protein expression in Escherichia coli, quantifying both plasticity and noise from the same dataset using flow cytometry. Essential genes exhibited lower noise and plasticity than nonessential genes. Nonessential genes showed a positive correlation between noise and plasticity, while essential genes did not. This study provides empirical evidence of essentiality-dependent coupling between noise and plasticity in protein expression, highlighting the organization of different types of variabilities.

Indexed as

Escherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGenes, EssentialRNA, MessengerEscherichia coli ProteinsRNA, MessengerBacteriaCanalizationEvolutionGene expressionNoisePlasticity

Identifiers

PMID40628805
PMCPMC12238574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.