ArticleScientific reports2025
Congruence between noise and plasticity in protein expression.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gene expression responds to various types of perturbations, such as mutations, environmental changes, and stochastic molecular noises. These different types of variability are often interdependent, where genes sensitive to one perturbation tend to be sensitive to others. However, the relationship between plasticity (variability in response to environmental changes) and noise (variability among cells under the same conditions) in gene expression remains debatable. Previous studies predicted a positive correlation between plasticity and noise in nonessential genes, but these were often measured at different levels: plasticity at the mRNA level and noise at the protein level. This methodological discrepancy complicates the understanding of their relationship. We addressed this by measuring protein expression in Escherichia coli, quantifying both plasticity and noise from the same dataset using flow cytometry. Essential genes exhibited lower noise and plasticity than nonessential genes. Nonessential genes showed a positive correlation between noise and plasticity, while essential genes did not. This study provides empirical evidence of essentiality-dependent coupling between noise and plasticity in protein expression, highlighting the organization of different types of variabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.