Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40628794›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Assessing the limits of delay of gratification in bumble bees.

Luigi Baciadonna, Eleonora Rovegno, Giulia Bigazzi, David Baracchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Luigi BaciadonnaDepartment of Biology, University of Florence, Via Madonna del Piano, 6, Sesto Fiorentino, 50019, Florence, Italy. luigi.baciadonna@upmc.fr.
Eleonora RovegnoDepartment of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, University of Ferrara, Via Luigi Borsari 46, 44121, Ferrara, Italy.
Giulia BigazziDepartment of Biology, University of Florence, Via Madonna del Piano, 6, Sesto Fiorentino, 50019, Florence, Italy.
David BaracchiDepartment of Biology, University of Florence, Via Madonna del Piano, 6, Sesto Fiorentino, 50019, Florence, Italy. david.baracchi@unifi.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to resist immediate temptation for a better, delayed outcome is thought to underpin advanced cognition. Traditionally, this ability has been studied in large-brained animals. However, to understand its evolutionary origins, it is necessary to expand the study to species with different life histories and ecological pressures, such as insects. Here, we investigated the ability to endure delayed gratification in the bumble bee Bombus terrestris using a delay maintenance task that assessed the capacity to sustain a delay for a large reward. Bees were first individually trained in a foraging arena to associate two differently coloured flowers either with an immediately accessible small reward (a 5 µl drop of 30% sucrose) or a delayed large reward (four 5 µl drops with a 15-s delay). Bumble bees were then tested over 10 delay choices between the two flowers/rewards. Finally, bees were tested in a delay maintenance test in which the 15-s delay was extended indefinitely. Overall, our findings suggest that bumble bees did not consistently choose the delayed reward over the immediate one across the ten trials, and their ability to sustain delay was highly variable across individuals. Although a small subset of bees (n = 5) exhibited prolonged waiting times comparable to those observed in mammals, birds, and fish (with one individual resisting for up to 364-s), the overall lack of consistency suggests that self-control in bumble bees may be limited and related to either ecological constraints or their foraging strategy. These results provide new insights into the evolutionary origins and drivers of self-control.

Indexed as

Delay DiscountingAnimalsBeesBehavior, AnimalFlowersRewardCognitive evolutionComparative cognitionForaging strategiesHymenopteraInvertebrate cognitionSelf-control

Identifiers

PMID40628794
PMCPMC12238607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.