ArticleScientific reports2025
Clinical outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant with different stem cell sources in infant acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of nutritional screening tools in pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Infant Leukemia: A Single-Center Case Series and Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in infants constitutes a rare and biologically distinct subgroup. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) plays a pivotal role in the treatment of infant AML. However, the source of stem cells remains insufficiently explored. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of allogeneic HSCT from different sources. We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of 27 infants with AML who underwent HSCT. We compared peripheral blood (PB) with/without bone marrow (BM) (Group 1, n = 16) versus umbilical cord blood (UCB) (Group 2, n = 12). There was no significant difference in 3-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), 3-year recurrence rates, or one-year cumulative graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) incidence between two groups (3-year OS: 80.36% for group 1 vs. 91.67% for group 2, p = 0.5474; DFS: 73.66% vs. 69.84%, p = 0.8232; GVHD: 56.25% for group 1 vs. 50.0% for group 2, p = 0.824). The group with pre-transplant minimal residual disease (MRD) status had a lower recurrence rate. This study emphasizes the efficacy of HSCT in the treatment of infant AML, with higher OS rates compared to childhood AML. It also supports UCB as a viable stem cell source. Achieving MRD-negative status before transplantation is crucial for improving post-transplant outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.