Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40628773›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

The self-reference memory bias is preceded by an other-reference bias in infancy.

Charlotte Grosse Wiesmann, Katrin Rothmaler, Esra Hasan, Kathrine Habdank, Chen Yang, Emanuela Yeung, Victoria Southgate

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Brain Network Signature of Autoscopic Phenomena in Humans.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Charlotte Grosse WiesmannResearch Group Milestones of Early Cognitive Development, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany. wiesmann@cbs.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2577-6174
Katrin RothmalerResearch Group Milestones of Early Cognitive Development, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8588-7664
Esra HasanResearch Group Milestones of Early Cognitive Development, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany.
Kathrine HabdankCenter for Early Childhood Cognition, Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Chen YangResearch Group Milestones of Early Cognitive Development, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4592-6547
Emanuela YeungCenter for Early Childhood Cognition, Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Victoria SouthgateCenter for Early Childhood Cognition, Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) GR 5421/1-2EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) ERC Consolidator Grant: DEVOMIND 726114EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) ERC Starting Grant: REPRESENT 101117806EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) Marie Słodowska-Curie Fellowship: ToMSelfLink 799734
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most established biases in human memory is that we remember information better when it refers to ourselves. We investigated the development of this self-reference effect and its relationship with the emergence of a self-concept. We presented 18-month-old infants with objects that were assigned either to them, or to another agent. Infants were then tested on their memory for the objects by presenting them with an image of each object, alongside a modified version of it. Mirror self-recognition served as an index of self-concept emergence. Infants who recognize themselves in the mirror remember objects assigned to themselves better than those assigned to the other. In contrast, non-self-recognizers only remember the objects assigned to the other rather than themselves. This difference is not explained by differences in infants' age or inhibitory abilities. This suggests that the self-reference effect emerges with the development of self-concept in the second year. Prior to the emergence of a self-concept, however, infants instead seem to exhibit an other-reference effect. This reversal of the classic self-reference effect suggests that early in life, when infants are heavily reliant on others for information, they may be biased towards encoding the world as it relates to others.

Indexed as

MemorySelf ConceptBiasChild DevelopmentFemaleHumansInfantMaleRecognition, Psychology

Identifiers

PMID40628773
PMCPMC12238355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.