ArticleNature communications2025
Neural signatures of emotional intent and inference align during social consensus.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Differences in other-directed emotion regulation tracks connectivity between amygdala and prefrontal regions during fairness decisions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Humans effortlessly transform dynamic social signals into inferences about other people's internal states. Here we investigate the neural basis of this process by collecting fMRI data from 100 participants as they rate the emotional intensity of people (targets) describing significant life events. Targets provide self-ratings on the same scale. We then train and validate two unique multivariate models of observer brain activity. The first predicts the target's self-ratings (i.e., intent), and the second predicts observer inferences. Correspondence between the intent and inference models' predictions on novel test data increases when observers are more empathically accurate. However, even when observers make inaccurate inferences, the target's intent can still be predicted from observer brain activity. These findings suggest that an observer's brain contains latent representations of other people's socioemotional intensity, and that fMRI models of intent and inference can be combined to predict empathic accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.