Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40628723›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Neural signatures of emotional intent and inference align during social consensus.

Marianne C Reddan, Desmond C Ong, Tor D Wager, Sonny Mattek, Isabella Kahhale, Jamil Zaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marianne C ReddanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA. marianne.reddan@einsteinmed.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6537-5258
Desmond C OngDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Tor D WagerDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1936-5574
Sonny MattekDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9371-9177
Isabella KahhaleDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Jamil ZakiDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. jzaki@stanford.edu.

Funding

Einstein-Montefiore Clinical and Translational Science Award HubUM1TR004400 · NCATS · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Jessica Kahn, Mimi Y Kim · 2023 to 2026
$17.3M
CTSA K12 Program at Einstein-MontefioreK12TR004411 · NCATS · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Deepa Rastogi · 2023 to 2026
$3.0M
The neural bases of placebo effects and their relation to regulatory processesR37MH076136 · NIMH · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI TOR D. WAGER · 2024 to 2026
$2.4M
Computational and brain predictors of emotion cue integrationR01MH112560 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ZAKI, JAMIL · 2017 to 2021
$2.2M
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, Inc.) R01MH112560NCATS NIH HHS K12 TR004411NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004400NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112560NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH076136U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) K12TR004411U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) R01MH112560
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans effortlessly transform dynamic social signals into inferences about other people's internal states. Here we investigate the neural basis of this process by collecting fMRI data from 100 participants as they rate the emotional intensity of people (targets) describing significant life events. Targets provide self-ratings on the same scale. We then train and validate two unique multivariate models of observer brain activity. The first predicts the target's self-ratings (i.e., intent), and the second predicts observer inferences. Correspondence between the intent and inference models' predictions on novel test data increases when observers are more empathically accurate. However, even when observers make inaccurate inferences, the target's intent can still be predicted from observer brain activity. These findings suggest that an observer's brain contains latent representations of other people's socioemotional intensity, and that fMRI models of intent and inference can be combined to predict empathic accuracy.

Indexed as

BrainConsensusEmotionsIntentionSocial PerceptionAdultBrain MappingEmpathyFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40628723
PMCPMC12238612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.