Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40628714›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Generic comparison of lumen nucleation and fusion in epithelial organoids with and without hydrostatic pressure.

Linjie Lu, Kana Fuji, Tristan Guyomar, Michèle Lieb, Marie André, Sakurako Tanida, Makiko Nonomura, Tetsuya Hiraiwa, Yara Alcheikh, Siham Yennek and 6 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Biophysics of lumen morphogenesis.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Linjie Lu *Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Illkirch, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1445-5201
Kana Fuji *Universal Biology Institute, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Tristan GuyomarInstitut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Illkirch, France.
Michèle LiebInstitut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Illkirch, France.
Marie AndréInstitut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Illkirch, France.
Sakurako TanidaUniversal Biology Institute, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Makiko NonomuraDepartment of Mathematical Information Engineering, College of Industrial Technology, Nihon University, Chiba, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4774-4173
Tetsuya HiraiwaUniversal Biology Institute, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3221-345X
Yara AlcheikhMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany.
Siham YennekThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Stem Cell Biology, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Heike PetzoldMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9518-4989
Cecilie Martin-LemaitreTechnische Universität Dresden, Biotechnologisches Zentrum, Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering (CMCB), Dresden, Germany.
Anne Grapin-BottonMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany. botton@mpi-cbg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1202-5235
Alf HonigmannMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany. alf.honigmann@tu-dresden.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0475-3790
Masaki SanoUniversal Biology Institute, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. sano.masaki@sjtu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6262-9635
Daniel RivelineInstitut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Illkirch, France. riveline@unistra.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4632-011X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many internal organs in the body harbor a fluid-filled lumen. Lumen nucleation and fusion have been reported as dependent on organ-type during organogenesis. In contrast, the physics of lumen suggests that force balance between luminal pressure and cell mechanics leads to generic rules. However, this hypothesis lacks experimental evidence. Here we compare lumen dynamics for three different systems (MDCK cysts, pancreatic spheres, and epiblast model) by using quantitative cell biology, microfabrication, and theory. We report that the initial cell number determines the maximum number of lumens but does not impact the steady state, which is a final single lumen. We show that lumen dynamics is determined by luminal hydrostatic pressure. We also use MDCK cysts to manipulate cell adhesion and lumen volume to successfully reproduce the fusion dynamics of pancreatic spheres and epiblasts. Our results reveal self-organisation rules of lumens with relevance for morphogenesis and tissue engineering.

Indexed as

Epithelial CellsOrganogenesisOrganoidsAnimalsCell AdhesionDogsHydrostatic PressureMadin Darby Canine Kidney CellsModels, BiologicalPancreasTissue Engineering

Identifiers

PMID40628714
PMCPMC12238380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.