ArticleEuropean journal of sport science2025
Kinematic Analysis of Synchronized Skaters During the Off-Ice Execution of Spiral and Spin Tasks.
Article in European journal of sport science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The primary objective of the present study was to examine differences and associations in joint angles and segmental swings during the off-ice execution of one static (spiral) and one dynamic (spin) sport-specific balance task and to determine whether motor control strategies differ when participants perform the tasks on their dominant and nondominant legs. Junior synchronized skaters (n = 15, age = 16.3 ± 1.5 years, years of practice: 9.8 ± 2.8 years, 10 females) performed spiral and spin tasks three times with 60 s of rest allowed between each trial. Participants' movements were captured using an optical-based motion capture (MoCap) system that utilized 39 skin-attached retro-reflective markers. Our results indicate no differences in synchronized skaters' kinematic features when the spiral task is performed on their dominant versus nondominant leg (p > 0.05). However, the results of Spearman's correlation analyses suggest different motor control strategies between the various body segments during right- versus left-leg task execution. In addition, participants produced a larger swing with their left versus right arm, regardless of whether the spiral task was performed on the dominant (39.97 ± 10.32 vs. 30.22 ± 7.80, p < 0.001) or the nondominant (52.88 ± 13.65 vs. 37.12 ± 9.59, p < 0.001) leg. Lastly, the association between the knee angle of the supporting leg and the swing of the head (ρ = -0.54; p = 0.038) suggests that the greater the knee angle of the support leg during the spins, the less compensatory head swing was needed during the task.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.