ReviewAnimal models and experimental medicine2025
Therapeutic targeting of myeloid cells in liver fibrosis: Mechanisms and clinical prospects.
Review in Animal models and experimental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Bisphenol F and Steatotic Liver Disease: Resolving the PXR Paradox Through Stress Pathway Mechanisms.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Therapeutic targeting of myeloid cells in liver fibrosis: Mechanisms and clinical prospects.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Liver fibrosis, a hallmark pathological endpoint of chronic aging-related liver diseases, remains a clinical challenge with limited therapeutic options. In healthy liver, myeloid cells constitute <5% of total hepatic immune cells, primarily comprising tissue-resident Kupffer cells. However, during aging or chronic injury, bone marrow-derived myeloid cell recruitment increases by two- to threefold in murine fibrotic models, reaching 15%-20% of intrahepatic immune populations. These infiltrating myeloid subsets exhibit functional plasticity, dynamically differentiating into pro-inflammatory macrophages or fibrosis-promoting Kupffer-like cells, contingent upon chemokine gradients (e.g., CCL2/CCR2 axis) and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). This review systematically examines the regulatory mechanisms of myeloid cells in liver fibrogenesis, with particular emphasis on their developmental origins, hepatic recruitment dynamics, functional heterogeneity, and pathogenic contributions to fibrosis. Furthermore, signaling pathways involving myeloid cells in liver fibrosis and therapeutic approaches modulating their differentiation and recruitment are discussed in this review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.