Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40628478›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025

Eco-evolutionary dynamics between multiple competitors reduce phytoplankton coexistence but have limited impacts on community productivity.

Charlotte Louise Briddon, Aurora Menéndez García, Giulia Ghedini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Charlotte Louise BriddonGIMM - Gulbenkian Institute, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1882-4297
Aurora Menéndez GarcíaGIMM - Gulbenkian Institute, Lisbon, Portugal.
Giulia GhediniGIMM - Gulbenkian Institute, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5156-2009

Funding

European Research Council 101116029European Union Horizon 2020la Caixa Foundation - European Union's Horizon 2020 LCF/BQ/PI21/11830001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Species can evolve rapidly in response to competition but how evolution within communities affects community properties is unclear. Niche theory predicts that species should evolve to use different resources, increasing coexistence and community productivity. However, recent experiments suggest that species might instead evolve their competitive ability, particularly when competing for essential resources. To test the consequences of species evolution on community properties, we grew three species of marine phytoplankton in monoculture (alone) or polyculture (together) for 4.5 months. We then combined them in communities based on their competition history and tracked community composition and productivity over time. We found that species dominance was unaffected, but coexistence was reduced when species evolved together (polyculture isolates). These species-level changes did not affect community functions equally. Total biovolume growth rates and carrying capacity were the same between communities of monoculture or polyculture isolates but the latter had greater oxygen fluxes during the exponential phase. Our results suggest that evolution within communities can strengthen competitive differences between species with uneven effects on community functioning. While some community properties seem robust to species evolutionary changes, we should be cautious in extrapolating the consequences of evolution from community biomass to other aspects of productivity or stability.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionEcosystemPhytoplanktonBiomassbiodiversitybiomasscommunity functioningcompetitionevolutionmetabolism

Identifiers

PMID40628478
PMCPMC12308329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.