Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40628476›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025

Strategic third-party interventions in feral ungulate affiliation.

George M W Hodgson, Kate J Flay, Tania A Perroux, Alan G McElligott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

George M W HodgsonDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, City University of Hong Kong Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0002-2531-6058
Kate J FlayDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, City University of Hong Kong Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0003-3770-3765
Tania A PerrouxDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, City University of Hong Kong Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0001-5164-2490
Alan G McElligottDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, City University of Hong Kong Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0001-5770-4568

Funding

City University of Hong Kong
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Third-party interventions in agonistic behaviour play a key role in the maintenance of social relationships, but very little is known about how interventions in affiliation affect the distribution of sociality within a group. Social context affects behaviour investment and partner choice, with audience effects, bystander dynamics and interventions allowing animals to strategically manipulate the behaviour of others and protect their own social bonds by impeding bonding attempts. We examined the relationships between ongoing allogrooming and bystanders in feral cattle (

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalGroomingSocial BehaviorAnimalsCattleFemaleMaleallogroomingBos taurusbystanderscattledominanceintervention behavioursocial bondssocial cognition

Identifiers

PMID40628476
PMCPMC12308338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.