Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40628409›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of dentistry2026

Patient Satisfaction and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life of Quadrilateral Bar versus Bilateral Linear Bar for Mandibular Implant Overdenture: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Heba Wageh Abozaed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Heba Wageh AbozaedDepartment of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate four implant complete mandibular overdentures retained with different bar designs regarding patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). Material and Methods: Twenty participants were selected for this study. Each participant received four implants in the mandibular canine and first molar regions. All patients were divided into two equal groups based on their bar designs: quadrilateral (group I) and bilateral linear (group II). A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to quantify patient satisfaction, and OHRQoL was determined using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14). Three months later, the VAS and OHIP-14 questions were evaluated. Statistical Analysis: For properly distributed data, continuous variables were shown as mean ± standard deviation. The Mann-Whitney Results: Patient satisfaction differs significantly between the two groups, as the quadrilateral bar designs enhance denture support and retention ( Conclusion: The quadrilateral bar demonstrated greater patient satisfaction than the bilateral linear bar regarding denture stability/retention and biting or chewing food. However, the bilateral linear bars increase patient satisfaction with denture comfort and the ease of hygienic procedures. Furthermore, regarding the functional limitations of the OHIP-14 questions, the bilateral linear bar provides higher scores than the quadrilateral ones.

Identifiers

PMID40628409
PMCPMC13160607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.