Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40628401›Full record

ReviewMolecular human reproduction2025

WERF Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonisation Project for Experimental Models in Endometriosis Research (EPHect-EM-Organoids): endometrial organoids as an emerging technology for endometriosis research.

Elizabeth E Marr, Juan S Gnecco, Stacey A Missmer, Shannon M Hawkins, Kevin G Osteen, Lone Hummelshoj, Erin Greaves, Kaylon L Bruner-Tran, EPHect Experimental Models Working Group

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular human reproduction, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. ReducedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elizabeth E MarrDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
Juan S GneccoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
Stacey A MissmerDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Shannon M HawkinsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Kevin G OsteenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Lone HummelshojWorld Endometriosis Research Foundation, London, UK.
Erin GreavesWorld Endometriosis Research Foundation, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9165-5851
Kaylon L Bruner-TranWorld Endometriosis Research Foundation, London, UK.
EPHect Experimental Models Working Group

Funding

World Endometriosis Research Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aetiology of endometriosis remains poorly understood. In vitro model systems provide the opportunity to identify the mechanisms driving disease pathogenesis using human cells. Three-dimensional models, particularly organoid systems, have revolutionized how we study epithelial biology and are powerful tools for modelling endometriosis. As an emerging model system, it is important to define protocols and identify the remaining challenges surrounding endometrial organoid culture to increase reproducibility and scientific rigour in endometriosis research. The World Endometriosis Research Foundation (WERF) established an international working group comprised of experts using in vitro approaches for the study of endometriosis. This working group harmonized protocols and documentation of existing and emerging organoid systems to maximize comparison and replication across the field and guide specific research hypotheses testing. This evaluation of organoid protocols, limitations, challenges, and alternative approaches assessed both published and grey literature papers across several disciplines pertinent to endometriosis research. Recommendations for protocol and documentation harmonization are presented, and we created the first-ever decision tree diagram to guide and facilitate the selection of existing models best suited for specific areas of endometriosis research. Rigorous and systematic assessment of emerging organoid systems, recognizing the inferential strengths and limitations of these approaches, is vital for endometriosis research. This comprehensive review of the benefits, limitations, and utilization of organoid models, as well as the consequent integration of protocols and documentation, will contribute to the scientific knowledge base by maximizing the reproducibility, comparability, and interpretation of research studies in endometriosis. Additionally, these newly developed protocols and documentation should serve as a resource for, and facilitate collaboration between, endometriosis investigators using organoids in their research methods.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksEndometriosisEndometriumOrganoidsFemaleHumansModels, Biologicalcollaborationemerging modelsendometriosisexperimental modelsorganoidsresearch

Identifiers

PMID40628401
PMCPMC12237518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.