ReviewMolecular human reproduction2025
WERF Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonisation Project for Experimental Models in Endometriosis Research (EPHect-EM-Pain): methods to assess pain behaviour in rodent models of endometriosis.
Review in Molecular human reproduction, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Behavioral attenuation of marble burying and digging mirrors evoked and non-evoked phenotypes in the endometriosis mouse model.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- WERF Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonisation Project for Experimental Models in Endometriosis Research (EPHect-EM-Organoids): endometrial organoids as an emerging technology for endometriosis research.Molecular human reproduction · 2025Review
- Enhancing collaboration in endometriosis research through the initiative of the World Endometriosis Research Foundation Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonisation Project (EPHect).Molecular human reproduction · 2025Article
- Pain in polycystic ovary syndrome: a comprehensive bedside to bench perspective on an underrecognized symptom.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pain is a debilitating symptom of endometriosis, and its mechanisms are often explored using rodent models. However, a lack of harmonization amongst models and behavioural measures, in addition to inconsistent reporting, might limit the overall clinical relevance and hinder translation of findings. An additional challenge is accurately linking rodent behaviour to human experiences of endometriosis. This study aimed to: (i) review current measures of pain-associated behaviours used in endometriosis studies; (ii) recommend best practices for each method and their suitability to study endometriosis-associated pain; and (iii) develop internationally agreed-upon standard operating procedures ('EPHect-EM-Pain SOPs'). The World Endometriosis Research Foundation (WERF) assembled an international working group, from which a 'pain behaviour working group' consisting of experts in the field was established. The group used additional consultation from experimental pain model scientists in the broader field. Stimulus-evoked (reflexive) and stimulus-independent (spontaneous) measures are currently used to assess pain-associated behaviours in rodents with experimental endometriosis. All existing methods offer advantages and limitations regarding ethological relevance, output quality, and equipment/training requisites. Internationally standardized pain SOPs as well as summary documentation outlining the minimum and standard requirements for several behavioural measures were developed, as well as consensus recommendations on experimental designs and documentation. To more closely reflect the lived experiences of those with endometriosis, the consortium recommends that, following validation, multiple types of pain-related and/or parallel rodent behaviours (e.g. anxiety) should be quantified as surrogate outcome measures for endometriosis-associated pain. These harmonized methods and documentation for endometriosis research will facilitate essential comparisons among studies, improve translational applicability, and provide a superior holistic view of animal (and thus human) wellbeing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.