ArticleBiology letters2025
Pigeons in a flock go cheap: a re-evaluation of the energetics of flying in cluster flocks.
Article in Biology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pigeons in a flock go cheap: a re-evaluation of the energetics of flying in cluster flocks.Biology letters · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The energy expended by animals during locomotion is often of considerable ecological importance. However, inaccurate conclusions about energy expenditure may arise if the limitations of the proxy variables being used to infer locomotion costs are not considered. The study of 'cluster' flocking behaviour in pigeons, using wingbeat frequency as a proxy for mechanical energy output, provides a useful illustration of these pitfalls. In contrast to claims in the literature, we suggest that published body kinematic values measured with accelerometers, along with our own heart rate data, show little evidence in support of the hypothesis that there is an increase in the mechanical energy costs for most pigeons to fly in a typical 'cluster' flock. Indeed, our re-analyses of acceleration-based measures of body power suggest there may be a positive energetic advantage to flying at low flock densities. We suggest that, when assessing energy expenditure using accelerometry-derived variables, the energy proxy units should be consistent with those of power, whether mass specific or absolute, and should control for differences in body mass and speed where appropriate. Accumulated total journey costs should also be assessed alongside instantaneous costs, with the former likely to be at least as ecologically significant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.