ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2025
The time-dependent reproduction number for epidemics in heterogeneous populations.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robust estimation of the time-dependent reproduction number in the presence of weekend reporting effects.BMC global and public health · 2026Article
- TheCommunications physics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The time-dependent reproduction number [Formula: see text] can be used to track pathogen transmission and to assess the efficacy of interventions. This quantity can be estimated by fitting renewal equation models to time series of infectious disease case counts. These models almost invariably assume a homogeneous population. Individuals are assumed not to differ systematically in the rates at which they come into contact with others. It is also assumed that the typical time that elapses between one case and those it causes (known as the generation-time distribution) does not differ across groups. But contact patterns are known to widely differ by age and according to other demographic groupings, and infection risk and transmission rates have been shown to vary across groups for a range of directly transmitted diseases. Here, we derive from first principles a renewal equation framework which accounts for these differences in transmission across groups. We use a generalization of the classic M'Kendrick-von Foerster equation to handle populations structured into interacting groups. This system of partial differential equations allows us to derive a simple analytical expression for [Formula: see text], which involves only group-level contact patterns and infection risks. We show that the same expression emerges from both deterministic and stochastic discrete-time versions of the model and demonstrate through simulations that our [Formula: see text] expression governs the long-run fate of epidemics. Our renewal equation model provides a basis from which to account for more realistic, diverse populations in epidemiological models and opens the door to inferential approaches which use known group characteristics to estimate [Formula: see text].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.