ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2025
Exclusion-based exome sequencing in critically ill adults 18-40 years old has a 24% diagnostic rate and finds racial disparities in access to genetic testing.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Utility of Rapid Whole-Genome Sequencing in Hospitalized Adults With Unexplained Neurologic Presentations.Neurology · 2026Article
- Racial and socioeconomic disparities in genetic evaluation and testing in the adult patient population.American journal of human genetics · 2026Article
- Practice-Based Insights into Adult Genetics: High Diagnostic Yield, Demographic Determinants, and Patterns of Test Utilization in Over 7,000 Patients.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the well-documented benefits of genome sequencing in critically ill pediatric patients, genomic testing is rarely utilized in critically ill adults, and data on its diagnostic yield and clinical implications in this population are lacking. We retrospectively analyzed whole-exome sequencing (WES) data from 365 adults ages 18-40 years with intensive care unit (ICU) admissions at the University of Pennsylvania Health System. For each participant, two medical genetics- and internal medicine-trained clinicians reviewed WES reports and patient charts for variant classification, result interpretation, and identification of genetic diagnoses related to their critical illness. We identified a diagnostic genetic variant in 24.4% of patients, with nearly half of these being unknown to patients and their care teams at the time of ICU admission. Of these genetic diagnoses, 76.6% conferred specific care-altering medical management recommendations. Importantly, diagnostic yield did not decrease with increasing patient age, and patients with undocumented diagnoses trended toward higher mortality rates compared to either patients with known diagnoses or patients with negative exomes. Significant disparities were seen by electronic health record-reported race, with genetic diagnoses known/documented for 63.1% of White patients at the time of ICU admission but only for 22.7% of Black patients. Altogether, the results of this study of broad, exclusion-based genetic testing in the critically ill adult population suggest that the broad implementation of genetic testing in critically ill adults has the potential to improve patient care and dismantle disparities in healthcare delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.