Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40627849›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

Identifying Psychosocial, Self-Management, and Health Profiles Among Women With Chronic Pain Who Have Experienced Intimate Partner Violence and Those Who Have Not: Protocol for a 2-Phase Qualitative and Cross-Sectional Study Using AI Techniques.

Ainara Nardi-Rodríguez, Sónia Bernardes, María Ángeles Pastor-Mira, Sofía López-Roig, Lidia Pamies-Aubalat, Andrés Sánchez-Prada, Victoria A Ferrer-Pérez, Ignacio Rodríguez-Rodríguez, Purificación Heras-González

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ainara Nardi-RodríguezUniversidad Miguel Hernández, Sant Joan D´Alacant, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3219-4973
Sónia BernardesISCTE-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6664-4859
María Ángeles Pastor-MiraUniversidad Miguel Hernández, Sant Joan D´Alacant, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9574-1666
Sofía López-RoigUniversidad Miguel Hernández, Sant Joan D´Alacant, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5303-4085
Lidia Pamies-AubalatUniversidad Miguel Hernández, Elche, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3408-3150
Andrés Sánchez-PradaPontifical University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6242-1236
Victoria A Ferrer-PérezUniversitat de les Illes Balears, Palma, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8096-4031
Ignacio Rodríguez-RodríguezUniversidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0118-3406
Purificación Heras-GonzálezUniversidad Miguel Hernández, Elche, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9458-7740

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen who experience intimate partner violence (IPV) are more likely to develop disabling chronic pain (CP). However, there is little information on what it means to live with CP while being exposed to IPV. In addition, despite well-established risk and protective factors for CP and its health outcomes, there are no data on whether these factors differ in women who have experienced IPV compared to those who have not.

objectiveOur aims are to understand the meaning and implications of living with CP for women who have experienced IPV compared to women with CP alone and to identify possible differences in risk and protective factors as well as health outcomes.

methodsWe have designed 2 studies to be conducted in 2 phases. The first phase will involve a qualitative study with a descriptive and exploratory design. Individual semistructured interviews will be conducted with at least 10 women with CP alone and with 10 women with CP who have experienced IPV. Reflexive thematic analysis will be used to examine participants' experiences, meanings, and realities. In the second phase, a cross-sectional study will be conducted with women with CP affected by IPV, including those currently experiencing IPV and those with past exposure to IPV, as well as women with CP who have never experienced IPV. A total of 359 women will complete various scales assessing risk and protective factors (eg, pain-related worrying and activity patterns) and health outcomes (eg, legal and illegal drug use and health care use). Data analysis will involve inferential statistics and machine learning.

resultsAs of May 2025, we had contacted relevant associations to present the project and begin recruiting voluntary participants. We have conducted the pilot study to assure the adequacy of the questionnaire and usability or technical functionality of the web-based platform. The results are expected to be published starting in January 2026.

conclusionsThis research addresses two urgent needs in pain research identified by the European Pain Federation: (1) expanding knowledge on CP management in relation to contextual factors; and (2) identifying specific psychosocial, self-management, and health profiles among women with CP who have experienced IPV and those who have not. This could provide valuable insights for personalizing pain management treatments. In addition, the findings may help identify women experiencing IPV who present to health care settings. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/66396.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceChronic PainIntimate Partner ViolenceSelf-ManagementAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchResearch DesignRisk FactorsAIartificial intelligencechronic painintimate partner violence against womenprofilesqualitative studyquantitative studyrisk factorstreatment

Identifiers

PMID40627849
PMCPMC12284455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.