Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40627690›Full record

SynthesisAge and ageing2025

Long-term clinical outcomes of delirium after hospital discharge: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yonas Tesfaye, Courtney R Davis, Melissa J Hull, Danielle Greaves, James du Preez, Sally Johns, Alice Bourke, Hannah A D Keage

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Age and ageing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Delirium Among Adults Undergoing Transcatheter Structural Heart Intervention: Incidence, Risk, and Clinical Phenotypes.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yonas TesfayeJustice and Society, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6707-9900
Courtney R DavisJustice and Society, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Melissa J HullClinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Danielle GreavesClinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
James du PreezFaculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
Sally JohnsNorthern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, Australia.
Alice BourkeNorthern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, Australia.
Hannah A D KeageJustice and Society, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6814-4997

Funding

Australian Government Research Training Program ScholarshipSouth Australian Hospital Research Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelirium has been linked to adverse health outcomes. There has not been a comprehensive attempt to synthesise these outcomes.

objectiveTo synthesise evidence comparing post-discharge clinical outcomes in individuals who experienced delirium in hospital compared to those who did not.

methodsA systematic electronic search was conducted in Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane databases. Random-effects models were used to assess effect size differences between those who experienced delirium and those who did not: odds ratios (OR) for categorical outcomes and Hedges' g for continuous outcomes. Analyses were conducted for each outcome relative to ≤6 months, >6-12 months, 12+ months and collapsed across time post-discharge.

resultsData were synthesised from 253 studies representing 29 814 participants who experienced delirium and 107 583 participants who did not experience delirium. The mean (SD) age of participants was 76.0 (9.3) years. Collapsed over follow-up period, results included, those who experienced delirium in hospital showed higher objective cognitive decline (OR = 1.58, P < .001), greater subjective cognitive impairment (OR = 2.11, P = .041), greater functional decline (g = -0.43, P = .001), lower quality of life (g = -0.44, P < .001), higher burden of poor mental health (OR = 1.69, P < .001), increased risk of dementia (OR = 5.37, P < .001), higher likelihood of institutionalisation (OR = 2.80, P < .001), greater rates of hospital readmission (OR = 1.70, P < .001) and increased mortality (OR = 2.55, P < .001) post-hospital discharge compared to those who did not experience delirium in hospital. Time-specific analyses did not reveal any consistent patterns of effects.

conclusionsOlder adults who experience delirium in hospital demonstrate significantly worse long-term clinical outcomes compared to those who do not.

Indexed as

DeliriumPatient DischargeAgedAged, 80 and overCognitionFemaleHumansMalePatient ReadmissionQuality of LifeRisk FactorsTime Factorsclinical outcomesdeliriumhospital dischargemeta-analysisolder adultssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40627690
PMCPMC12236429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.