ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Advancing genetic engineering with active learning: theory, implementations and potential opportunities.
Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-Guided DNA-Free and Genotype-Independent Genome Editing for Soybean Improvement.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Deciphering key factors of active learning performance in biomolecular design.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Descent from a common ancestor restricts exploration of protein sequence space.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Data augmentation alters feature importance in XGBoost for CVD prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Employing machine learning (ML) models to accelerate experimentation and uncover biological mechanisms has been a rising tendency in genetic engineering. However, effectively collecting data to enhance model accuracy and improve design remains challenging, especially when data quality is poor and validation resources are limited. Active learning (AL) addresses this by iteratively identifying promising candidates, thereby reducing experimental efforts while improving model performance. This review highlights how AL can assist scientists throughout the design-build-test-learn cycle, explore its various practical implementations, and discuss its potential through the integration of cross-domain expertise. In the age of genetic engineering revolutionized by data-driven ML models, AL presents an iterative framework that significantly enhances the functionalities of biomolecules and uncovers their intrinsic mechanisms, all while minimizing expenses and efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.