ArticlePloS one2025
Associations between ambient particulate matter exposure and the prevalence of arthritis: Findings from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synergistic effects of ambient particulate matter and extreme weather events on arthritis risk: a prospective cohort study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- How Ambient Pollutants Accelerate Aging: Bridging Epigenetics, Age-Stratified Effects, and Public Health Interventions.Environment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArthritis is a leading cause of global disability, but its etiology is complex and has not yet been fully understood. Recent studies suggest that air pollution is potentially linked to arthritis onset, although current research predominantly focuses on the effects of particulate matter (PM2.5). There is a lack of comprehensive analysis regarding the influence of various particulate pollutants and their key constituents on arthritis prevalence. This research used China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) data and explored the associations between arthritis prevalence and different particulate matters (PM2.5, PM10, and PM1, ≤ 2.5 micrometers, ≤ 10 micrometers, and ≤ 1 micrometer in diameter, respectively), as well as ammonium (NH4) and nitrate (NO3), with gaseous pollutants [such as sulfate (SO4) and ozone (O3)] as a reference.
methodsThis study was conducted based on the 2015 CHARLS cross-sectional data, and 3,802 participants were included. The levels of air pollution exposure were estimated using a spatial-temporal extreme random forest model, integrating ground monitoring, remote sensing data, and model simulations, encompassing PM1, PM2.5, PM10, NH4, NO3, O3, and SO4 concentrations. The association of air pollution with arthritis prevalence was assessed utilizing generalized linear models (GLM), while adjusting for various confounding variables.
resultsLong-term exposure to PM₁, PM₂.₅, PM₁₀, NH₄ ⁺ , and NO₃ ⁻ was positively associated with self-reported arthritis prevalence. Specifically, each interquartile range (IQR) increase in PM₁ corresponded to 4.4% higher odds of arthritis (odds ratio [OR] per IQR: 1.044; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.011-1.070), indicating a modest association. Subsequent ORs per IQR for PM₂.₅ and PM₁₀ were 1.019 (95% CI: 1.004-1.036) and 1.012 (95% CI: 1.002-1.021), respectively, reflecting similar but smaller positive associations, whereas NH₄⁺ and NO₃ ⁻ showed moderate associations with ORs per IQR of 1.143 (95% CI: 1.017-1.285) and 1.082 (95% CI: 1.011-1.159), respectively. These findings were robust to sensitivity analyses.
conclusionTo our knowledge, this is the first study to identify a significant association between long-term exposure to PM₁, PM₂.₅, PM₁₀ and the secondary inorganic aerosol constituents NH₄ and NO₃, and the prevalence of self-reported arthritis in middle-aged and older adults. However, owing to its cross-sectional design, the absence of subtype differentiation and reliance on self-reported diagnoses, these findings may be influenced by reverse causation and measurement error, and should therefore be interpreted with caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.