Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40627630›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Predicting errors in accident hotspots and investigating satiotemporal, weather, and behavioral factors using interpretable machine learning: An analysis of telematics big data.

Ali Golestani, Nazila Rezaei, Mohammad-Reza Malekpour, Naser Ahmadi, Seyed Mohammad-Navid Ataei, Sepehr Khosravi, Ayyoob Jafari, Saeid Shahraz, Farshad Farzadfar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ali GolestaniNon-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Nazila RezaeiNon-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad-Reza MalekpourNon-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Naser AhmadiNon-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Mohammad-Navid AtaeiNon-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6463-4784
Sepehr KhosraviNon-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ayyoob JafariFaculty of Electrical, Biomedical and Mechatronics Engineering, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran.
Saeid ShahrazInstitute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Farshad FarzadfarNon-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8288-4046

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRoad traffic accidents (RTAs) are a major public health concern with significant health and economic burdens. Identifying high-risk areas and key contributing factors is essential for developing targeted interventions. While machine learning (ML) has been increasingly used to predict RTAs, the lack of interpretability limits its applicability in policymaking. This study aimed to utilize interpretable ML models to predict the occurrence of errors in road accident hotspots using telematics data in Iran and interpret the most influential predictors.

methodsWe utilized data collected via telematics from 1673 intercity buses throughout the year 2020, spanning cities across all provinces of Iran. Merging this data with a weather-related dataset resulted in a comprehensive dataset containing location, time, weather, and error type variables. After preprocessing, 619,988 records without any missing values were used to train and compare the performance of six machine learning models including logistic regression, K-nearest neighbors, random forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Naïve Bayes, and support vector machine. The best model was selected for interpretation using SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanation). Due to the high imbalance in the outcome, an ensemble approach was applied to train all models.

resultsXGBoost demonstrated the best performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 91.70% (95% uncertainty interval: 91.33% - 92.09%). SHAP values highlighted spatial-related variables, particularly the province of error and road type, as the most critical features for predicting errors in accident hotspots in Iran. Fatigue, as a behavioral error, was associated with a higher risk of predicting errors in accident hotspots, and certain weather-related variables including dew points and relative humidity also exhibited importance. However, temporal variables did not contribute significantly to the prediction.

conclusionBy integrating spatiotemporal, behavioral, and weather-related variables, our study highlighted the dominance of spatial factors in predicting errors in accident hotspots. These findings underscore the need for targeted road infrastructure improvements and data-driven policymaking to mitigate RTA risks.

Indexed as

Accidents, TrafficBig DataMachine LearningWeatherBayes TheoremHumansIran

Identifiers

PMID40627630
PMCPMC12237018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.