Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40627622›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Solitary phytoplankton cells sink in the mesopelagic ocean.

Annie Bodel, Margaret Estapa, Colleen A Durkin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Annie BodelMonterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, Moss Landing, California, United States of America.
Margaret EstapaSchool of Marine Sciences, Darling Marine Center, University of Maine, Walpole, Maine, United States of America.
Colleen A DurkinMonterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, Moss Landing, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5619-4914

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phytoplankton, and their carbon, are typically exported from the surface ocean when packaged inside larger, sinking detrital particles. This process draws carbon out of the atmosphere, where it can be sequestered for long time periods in the deep ocean. Phytoplankton can also sink as solitary cells, but direct observations are scarce and the ecological significance is unknown. We collected unprecedented observations of solitary sinking cells during month-long observations in the upper 500 m at two contrasting ocean locations. While these cells account for only a small fraction of the total particulate organic carbon flux (<5%), they provide essential nutrients and a persistent source of food to deep sea ecosystems while preserving a seed bank for future phytoplankton blooms. In one case, observed depth changes over time allowed calculation of a sinking speed of 6 m d-1. The disaggregation of detrital aggregates collected at the same time could not account for the magnitude or composition of individually sinking cells in our samples, although in some instances their fluxes were correlated. Instead, the data imply that these solitary cells were transferred through the upper mesopelagic as individually sinking particles and play key roles in ocean ecology and biogeochemistry.

Indexed as

PhytoplanktonCarbonEcosystemOceans and SeasSeawaterCarbon

Identifiers

PMID40627622
PMCPMC12237049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.