ArticleNeural computation2025
Predictive Coding Model Detects Novelty on Different Levels of Representation Hierarchy.
Article in Neural computation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural Associative Skill Memories for Safer Robotics and Modeling Human Sensorimotor Repertoires.Neural computation · 2025Article
- Continual familiarity decoding from recurrent connections in spiking networks.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Novelty detection, also known as familiarity discrimination or recognition memory, refers to the ability to distinguish whether a stimulus has been seen before. It has been hypothesized that novelty detection can naturally arise within networks that store memory or learn efficient neural representation because these networks already store information on familiar stimuli. However, existing computational models supporting this idea have yet to reproduce the high capacity of human recognition memory, leaving the hypothesis in question. This article demonstrates that predictive coding, an established model previously shown to effectively support representation learning and memory, can also naturally discriminate novelty with high capacity. The predictive coding model includes neurons encoding prediction errors, and we show that these neurons produce higher activity for novel stimuli, so that the novelty can be decoded from their activity. Additionally, hierarchical predictive coding networks detect novelty at different levels of abstraction within the hierarchy, from low-level sensory features like arrangements of pixels to high-level semantic features like object identities. Overall, based on predictive coding, this article establishes a unified framework that brings together novelty detection, associative memory, and representation learning, demonstrating that a single model can capture these various cognitive functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.