Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40627607›Full record

ArticleNeural computation2025

Predictive Coding Model Detects Novelty on Different Levels of Representation Hierarchy.

T Ed Li, Mufeng Tang, Rafal Bogacz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural computation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

T Ed LiMRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3TH, U.K.
Mufeng TangMRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3TH, U.K. mufeng.tang@ndcn.ox.ac.uk.
Rafal BogaczMRC Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3TH, U.K. rafal.bogacz@ndcn.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program (INP)T32NS041228 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Charles A Greer, Marina R Picciotto · 2001 to 2026
$12.0M
Medical Research Council MC_UU_00003/1NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS041228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Novelty detection, also known as familiarity discrimination or recognition memory, refers to the ability to distinguish whether a stimulus has been seen before. It has been hypothesized that novelty detection can naturally arise within networks that store memory or learn efficient neural representation because these networks already store information on familiar stimuli. However, existing computational models supporting this idea have yet to reproduce the high capacity of human recognition memory, leaving the hypothesis in question. This article demonstrates that predictive coding, an established model previously shown to effectively support representation learning and memory, can also naturally discriminate novelty with high capacity. The predictive coding model includes neurons encoding prediction errors, and we show that these neurons produce higher activity for novel stimuli, so that the novelty can be decoded from their activity. Additionally, hierarchical predictive coding networks detect novelty at different levels of abstraction within the hierarchy, from low-level sensory features like arrangements of pixels to high-level semantic features like object identities. Overall, based on predictive coding, this article establishes a unified framework that brings together novelty detection, associative memory, and representation learning, demonstrating that a single model can capture these various cognitive functions.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNeural Networks, ComputerNeuronsRecognition, PsychologyHumansLearning

Identifiers

PMID40627607
PMCPMC7618029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.