ArticlePloS one2025
Plant attribute extraction: An enhancing three-stage deep learning model for relational triple extraction.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Various plant attributes, such as growing environment, growth cycle, and ecological distribution, can provide support to fields like agricultural production and biodiversity. This information is widely dispersed in texts. Manual extraction of this information is highly inefficient due to a fact that it not only takes considerable time but also increases the likelihood of overlooking relevant details. To convert textual data into structured information, we extract relational triples in the form of (subject, relation, object), where the subject represents the names of plants, the object represents the plant attributes, and the relation represents the classification of plant attributes. To reduce complexity, we employ a joint extraction of entities and relations based on a tagging scheme. The task is broken down into three parts. Firstly, a matrix is used to simultaneously match plant entities and plant attributes. Then, the predefined categories of plant attributes are classified. Finally, the categories of plant attributes are matched with entity-attribute pairs. The tagging-based method typically utilizes parameter sharing to facilitate interaction between different tasks, but it can also lead to issues such as error amplification and instability in parameter updates. Thus, we adopt improved techniques at different stages to enhance the performance of our model. This includes adjustment to the word embedding layer of BERT and optimization in relation prediction. The modification of the word embedding layer is intended to better integrate contextual information during text representation and reduce the interference of erroneous information. The relation prediction part mainly involves multi-level information fusion of textual information, thereby making corrections and highlighting important information. We name the three-stage method as "Bwdgv". Compared to the currently advanced PRGC model, the F1-score of the proposed method has an improvement of 1.4%. With the help of extracted triples, we can construct knowledge graphs and other tasks to better apply various plant attributes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.