Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40627494›Full record

SynthesisSchizophrenia bulletin2025

Atypical Use of Visuospatial Context in Psychotic Psychopathology: A Meta-analysis.

Victor J Pokorny, Samuel D Klein, Collin D Teich, Scott R Sponheim, Cheryl A Olman, Sylia Wilson

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Victor J PokornyDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1003-0196
Samuel D KleinDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9365-7156
Collin D TeichDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Scott R SponheimDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2782-0856
Cheryl A OlmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Sylia WilsonUniversity of Minnesota Institute of Child Development, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

Perceptual Mechanisms of Visual Hallucinations and Illusions in PsychosisR01MH112583 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI SPONHEIM, SCOTT R · 2017 to 2021
$2.4M
Training in genetic and neurobehavioral mechanisms of addictionT32DA050560 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Monica Luciana, Scott Ian Vrieze · 2020 to 2026
$2.0M
National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship 00074041National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship R01 NS123482NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA050560NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112583
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and hypothesisVisual perception in people with psychotic disorders is thought to be minimally influenced by surrounding visual elements (ie, visuospatial context). Visuospatial context paradigms have the unique potential to clarify the neural bases of psychotic disorders because the neural mechanisms are well studied in both animal and human models. However, the published literature on the subject is conflicting and heterogeneous. A systematic consolidation and evaluation of the published evidence is needed. STUDY

designWe conducted a meta-analysis of 54 articles spanning over 50 years of research. Articles included behavioral, functional magnetic resonance imaging, and electroencephalogram reports of size, contrast, contour, lightness, orientation, and motion perception in schizophrenia (SCZ), bipolar disorder, and subclinical populations. STUDY

resultsWhen pooling across all task types, we found weak evidence of reduced use of visuospatial context in SCZ (Hedges' g = 0.20) and bipolar disorder (g = 0.25). The strongest evidence was observed for altered contrast perception in SCZ (g = 0.73). With respect to subclinical populations, we observed immense heterogeneity in populations of interest and study designs.

conclusionsWe observed surprisingly weak evidence that psychotic disorders are associated with generally reduced use of visuospatial context. Instead, we observed the strongest evidence for a specific alteration in contrast perception. We propose altered feedback to the primary visual cortex as a potential neural mechanism underlying this effect. Moderating factors such as stage and phase of illness may explain some of the heterogeneity we observed in effect sizes; further research is needed to clarify how disease state relates to altered use of visuospatial context.

Indexed as

Bipolar DisorderPsychotic DisordersSchizophreniaSpace PerceptionVisual PerceptionHumansbipolarillusionsperceptionschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID40627494
PMCPMC12236325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.