ArticleEnvironmental toxicology and chemistry2025
Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) Coaching Program-how it functions and contributes to a more harmonized approach to AOP development and construction of AOP networks with regulatory utility.
Article in Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systematic Screening of Depression-Related Neurotoxicity Across 26 Bisphenols Reveals an ESR1-CREB1-GRIN2B-Associated Mechanism.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Accelerating AOP Development in the AOP-Wiki with AI: A Practical Road Map for the Community.Environmental science & technology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The adverse outcome pathway (AOP) framework contributes to understanding how specific and measurable biological perturbations cause adverse effects on human and environmental health. Recognizing the value of AOPs to support regulatory decisions around the world, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) launched the AOP Programme in 2012, which sought to promote and guide the development of AOPs to ensure their suitability for the downstream applications in the context of regulatory safety assessment. The OECD published the initial guidance on AOP development and assessment in 2013, which has been expanded as practices have evolved and matured. Adverse outcome pathway development requires adherence to specific principles and considerations for identifying and describing key events (KEs) and representing and assessing the weight of evidence for the key event relationships. Ultimately, the structured and consistent application of the principles helps build confidence in the applicability of the knowledge represented in the AOP for decision-making in the regulatory context. To assist new AOP developers, in 2019, the OECD introduced a coaching program. This program primarily aims to pair novices with experienced AOP developers (i.e., coaches). International partnerships in the coaching program contribute to harmonizing and promoting AOP development according to OECD guidance. Coaches have also helped to identify and initiate "gardening" efforts that remove redundant/synonymous KEs in the AOP-Wiki, allowing for improved AOP network creation, promoting the reuse of extensively reviewed KEs, and ensuring the development of high-quality AOPs. The AOP Coaching Program represents the latest international activity to ensure that AOPs are developed in a consistent manner that is designed to enhance their use for supporting public health decisions around the world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.