Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40627355›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2025

Protection Against Persistent HPV-16/18 Infection After Different Number of Doses of Quadrivalent Vaccine in Girls and Young Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Chantal Sauvageau, Marie-Hélène Mayrand, Manale Ouakki, Iulia Gabriela Ionescu, François Coutlée, Julie Lacaille, Mélanie Benoit, Vladimir Gilca

Registry-linked trialAbstract readEquivalence TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02009800 (ICI-VPH), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02009800 phase3completednot on this map

ICI-VPH: Impact Des Calendriers d'Immunisation Contre Les HPV

TypeinterventionalSponsorCHU de Quebec-Universite LavalRan2013 to 2021Enrolled3,364ConditionsHuman Papillomavirus InfectionsArmsQuadrivalent HPV vaccine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chantal SauvageauCentre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Marie-Hélène MayrandCentre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Manale OuakkiInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Iulia Gabriela IonescuInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Québec, Québec, Canada.
François CoutléeCentre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Julie LacailleCentre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Mélanie BenoitCentre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Vladimir GilcaInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Québec, Québec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: There are no randomized studies comparing the long-term effectiveness of a 2-dose schedule (administered at 0 and 6 months) of quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine (4vHPV) with a 2 + 1-dose schedule (administered at 0, 6, and 60 months) given to preadolescents for the prevention of persistent HPV-16 and HPV-18 infection. Objective: To evaluate whether a 2-dose 4vHPV schedule is noninferior to a 2 + 1-dose schedule for preventing persistent HPV-16 and HPV-18 infection up to 13 years after the first dose. Design, Setting, and Participants: This 2-arm, parallel, noninferiority, randomized clinical trial (RCT), called ICI-VPH (Impact of HPV Immunization Schedules Against HPV), was conducted in Québec, Canada, from 2013 to 2021. Eligible participants were girls who had received 2 doses of 4vHPV, 6 months apart when they were aged 9 to 11 years, 5 years prior to trial recruitment. Efficacy-evaluable population analysis was conducted between April 2023 and June 2024. Interventions: Participants were randomized 1:1 to the 2-dose or 2 + 1-dose groups. The 2 + 1-dose group received a booster dose of 4vHPV at the recruitment visit. Both groups were instructed on how to self-collect a vaginal sample, provided an initial vaginal swab, and completed an online questionnaire. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was persistent HPV-16 and HPV-18 infection, defined as the presence of HPV-16 or HPV-18 DNA in 2 consecutive vaginal samples self-collected 5 to 15 months apart. Results: Among the 3356 participants, the mean (SD) age at enrollment was 14.8 (0.4) years, and 2867 (85.4%) were French Canadian individuals. Of the 3364 participants initially randomized, 8 (0.2%) withdrew immediately after randomization, 1675 (49.8%) were assigned to the 2-dose group, and 1681 (50.0%) were assigned to the 2 + 1-dose group. Of the 16 989 genotyping tests analyzed, 31 (0.2%) detected vaccine-type HPV-6, -11, -16, and -18. Only 1 participant in the 2 + 1-dose group (0.1%) had a time-limited persistent HPV-16 infection. Conclusions and Relevance: This clinical trial found that the incidence of HPV-16 and HPV-18 infection was low with both the 2-dose and 2 + 1-dose 4vHPV schedules. A 2-dose schedule provided robust protection against persistent HPV-16 and HPV-18 infection for up to 13 years, suggesting that a booster dose administered at 60 months would not provide additional benefit. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02009800.

Indexed as

Human papillomavirus 16Human papillomavirus 18Human Papillomavirus Recombinant Vaccine Quadrivalent, Types 6, 11, 16, 18Immunization SchedulePapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesAdolescentChildFemaleHumansQuebecHuman Papillomavirus Recombinant Vaccine Quadrivalent, Types 6, 11, 16, 18Papillomavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID40627355
PMCPMC12238905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.