Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40627348›Full record

ReviewDiabetes2025

High-Quality Weight Loss in Obesity: Importance of Skeletal Muscle.

Mary-Ellen Harper, Robert R M Dent, Ruth McPherson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mary-Ellen HarperDepartment of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3864-5886
Robert R M DentDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Ruth McPhersonDivision of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9087-6107

Funding

Institute of Nutrition, Metabolism and Diabetes 183651
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment responses to behavioral, surgical, and pharmacological approaches in obesity are highly variable in quantity and quality. Here we refer to high-quality weight loss as a high proportion of fat to skeletal muscle mass lost. Given the role of skeletal muscle in energy expenditure, glucose homeostasis, metabolic flexibility, mobility, and strength, excessive loss of skeletal muscle during weight loss is a concern for overall health. Challenges in accurately measuring body composition, especially skeletal muscle, limit our understanding of muscle loss during obesity treatment. Recent incretin-related pharmacotherapies improve muscle metabolic health by enhancing glucose uptake and reducing muscle lipids but, like other weight loss interventions, are associated with muscle loss. Newer pharmacological interventions are being developed to minimize muscle loss, but many questions remain. This article examines the metabolic importance of skeletal muscle and its measurement clinically, as well as key genetic and metabolic factors influencing skeletal muscle and the quality of weight loss. Genetics can affect muscle composition (e.g., fiber types) and function. Together with metabolic factors, including neurohormonal responses and skeletal muscle metabolic efficiency and adaptation, there is variability in weight loss outcomes. In future research investigators should continue to focus on factors affecting skeletal muscle and on personalized strategies to optimize weight loss quality preserving the physical and metabolic functions of skeletal muscle. ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS: High-quality weight loss, i.e., a high proportion of fat to skeletal muscle lost during the treatment of obesity, is advantageous for metabolic and physical health. Precise and accurate determinations of skeletal muscle mass in clinical settings are often challenging. In prevention of excessive loss of skeletal muscle during weight loss, advantages include minimization of metabolic adaptation that makes it difficult to sustain weight loss, improved glucose homeostasis and metabolic flexibility, and better mobility and strength. Effective approaches to preserving skeletal muscle include sufficient dietary protein and inclusion of exercise (especially resistance exercise) during weight loss; new pharmacological approaches are under development.

Indexed as

Muscle, SkeletalObesityWeight LossBody CompositionEnergy MetabolismHumans

Identifiers

PMID40627348
PMCPMC12645252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.