Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40627308›Full record

ReviewBiologia futura2025

Reasons to avoid using weasel words in ethology: establishing a more technical terminology may facilitate synthesis in the behavioural sciences.

Roszik Sára, Miklósi Ádám

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Biologia futura, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Roszik SáraDepartment of Ethology, Institute of Biology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary. rosziks2000@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-3081-5815
Miklósi ÁdámDepartment of Ethology, Institute of Biology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The term 'weasel word' is used for vague, ambiguous, or misleading language when the speaker creates an impression of meaning or certainty without committing to specific facts. In academic writings, clear presentation of the declarant's thoughts is inevitable for the transmission and/or sharing of knowledge with high fidelity; hence, weasel words and phrases should be avoided. So far, the topic has received little attention in the behavioural sciences, including ethology, although research in fields focusing on behaviour and the mind provide fertile ground where such rhetorical strategies may go unnoticed. By presenting examples of weasel words used in ethology, we aim to demonstrate how they can lead to misunderstandings among scientists, as well as to prolonged and unproductive debates. We argue that the use of weasel words may stem equally from ingrained bad habits, knowledge gaps, anthropomorphism and inconsistent jargon. Instead of referring to mental states, the description of the behaviours should be in focus from a functional point of view. This allows more precise behaviour measurement and greater agreement in the use of terminology. Adopting a more descriptive and precise terminology may facilitate interdisciplinary discussions and lay the groundwork for novel approaches, such as synthetic or computational ethology.

Indexed as

EthologyTerminology as TopicAnimalsBehavior, AnimalLanguageBehaviour scienceCognitionEthologyScientific languageTerminologyWeasel words

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.