ArticleNeurology and therapy2025
Licensed Subcutaneous Infusion Therapies in Advanced Parkinson's Disease: An Indirect Treatment Comparison and Cost-Minimisation Analysis.
Article in Neurology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Multicentre,Parallel-group,Double-blind,Placebo-controlled Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Apomorphine sc Infusion in Parkinson's Disease Patients With Motor Complications Not Well Controlled on Medical Treatment
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Controlled Study Comparing the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of ABBV-951 to Oral Carbidopa/Levodopa in Advanced Parkinson's Disease Patients
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-world experience with foslevodopa/foscarbidopa in Germany: therapeutic insights and lessons learned.Neurological research and practice · 2026Review
- Review
- Refractory Motor Complications: Towards a Pragmatic Definition.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2026Article
- Impact of device-aided therapies on quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease. A comparative multicenter observational study.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionParkinson's disease is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder. In advanced Parkinson's disease, subcutaneous (SC) infusion therapies represent minimally invasive and reversible treatment options. In the United Kingdom (UK), licensed SC infusion therapies include apomorphine and foslevodopa-foscarbidopa; both represent effective and generally well-tolerated therapies, although uncertainties regarding their relative efficacy, safety and costs remain.
methodsThe relative efficacy and safety of apomorphine and foslevodopa-foscarbidopa was assessed via Bucher indirect treatment comparison (ITC) of TOLEDO (NCT02006121) and M15-736 (NCT04380142) data, with findings used to support a cost-minimisation analysis (CMM). Thirteen outcomes were evaluated. Efficacy and safety outcomes were measured as mean differences and risk differences, respectively. The CMM, conducted from a UK healthcare payer perspective, considered treatment acquisition and concomitant therapy costs over a 6.34-year horizon (obtained from a published observational study).
resultsBucher ITC results provided evidence for a comparable efficacy for apomorphine and foslevodopa-foscarbidopa in advanced Parkinson's disease. ITCs also indicated comparable safety, although a trend in favour of apomorphine was identified for hallucinations and most infusion site reactions assessed. The CMM demonstrated a clear per-patient cost benefit for apomorphine versus foslevodopa-foscarbidopa (£120,173.70), primarily driven by lower drug acquisition costs.
conclusionThe main difference between UK licensed SC infusion therapies for advanced Parkinson's disease relates to cost as opposed to clinical outcome, with some evidence for improved tolerability of apomorphine. This supports the continued use of apomorphine as first-line SC infusion treatment for advanced Parkinson's disease in UK clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.