ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Investigating the Potential of Generative AI Clinical Case-Based Simulations on Radiography Education: A Pilot Study.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Critical evaluation of large language models for human cross-sectional anatomy identification: implications for collaborative intelligence.BMC research notes · 2026Article
- AI-Enhanced Virtual Simulation as an Adjunct to Skills Laboratory and Clinical Training in Radiography Education: A Commentary from Somalia and Other Resource-Constrained Settin.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
- From information literacy to health literacy: AI-driven transformation in university libraries under digital public health-a perspective.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Education for medical imaging technologists or radiographers in regional and rural areas often faces significant challenges due to limited financial, technological, and teaching resources. Generative AI presents a promising solution to overcome these barriers and support the professional development of radiographers. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the educational value of an in-house AI-based imaging simulation tool designed to generate clinically relevant medical images for professional training purposes. In July 2023, a professional development lecture featuring AI-generated clinical imaging content was delivered to students (N = 122/130) and recent graduates (N = 155/532), alongside a pre-lecture survey. Following the session, participants completed a questionnaire comprising structured and open-ended items to assess their understanding, perceptions, and interest in AI within medical imaging education. Survey results indicated that both students and graduates possessed a foundational awareness of AI applications in medical imaging. Graduates demonstrated significantly higher expectations for clinical realism in AI-generated simulations, likely reflecting their clinical experience. Although the simulator's current capabilities are limited in replicating complex diagnostic imaging, participants acknowledged its pedagogical value, particularly in supporting basic anatomical education. Approximately 50% of respondents expressed interest in further developing their AI knowledge and contributing to the research and development of AI-based educational tools. AI-driven imaging simulation tools have the potential to enhance radiography education and reduce teaching barriers. While further development is needed to improve clinical fidelity, such tools can play a valuable role in foundational training and foster learner engagement in AI innovation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.