Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40627291›Full record

Observational studyGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2025

Effect of anamorelin on body weight in patients with gastric cancer-associated cachexia: an observational study.

Yoshitomo Yanagimoto, Kotaro Yamashita, Ryohei Kawabata, Takeshi Omori, Masaaki Motoori, Yujiro Nakahara, Yutaka Kimura, Haruna Furukawa, Takuro Saito, Kazuyoshi Yamamoto and 4 more

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Methodological and reporting considerations in real-world anamarin studies of gastric cancer-related cachexia.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Yoshitomo YanagimotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Kotaro YamashitaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. kyamashita@gesurg.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.
Ryohei KawabataDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
Takeshi OmoriDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Masaaki MotooriDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
Yujiro NakaharaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Medical and Science Center, Osaka Keisatsu Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Yutaka KimuraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kindai Nara Hospital, Nara, Japan.
Haruna FurukawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Rinku General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
Takuro SaitoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Kazuyoshi YamamotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Tsuyoshi TakahashiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Yukinori KurokawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Hidetoshi EguchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Yuichiro DokiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.

Funding

Japanese Gastric Cancer Association JGCA-031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2021, anamorelin, a ghrelin receptor agonist, was approved in Japan for cancer cachexia in select cancers, including gastric cancer. However, evidence regarding its efficacy and predictive factors in patients with gastric cancer remains lacking.

methodsThis prospective observational study encompassed 229 patients with unresectable, advanced, or recurrent gastric cancer and cancer cachexia who received anamorelin from 2021 to 2023 at 25 institutions affiliated with Osaka University. Body weight change at 12 weeks was the primary endpoint. Appetite, food intake, treatment compliance, and adverse events comprised the secondary endpoints. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were employed for identifying weight gain predictors.

resultsOf the 229 patients (median age, 73 years), 126 completed the 12-week follow-up. The median anamorelin administration duration was 62 days. The mean weight significantly increased from baseline to 4, 8, and 12 weeks (up to + 0.88 kg, p < 0.001). Moreover, appetite and food intake improved. Multivariable analysis identified baseline body mass index (BMI) < 20 kg/m

conclusionIn patients with gastric cancer-related cachexia, anamorelin was associated with significant increases in body weight and improvements in appetite. Lower BMI and lower systemic inflammation (NLR < 4.0) were predictive of better response.

Indexed as

Body WeightCachexiaOligopeptidesStomach NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overAppetiteFemaleHumansHydrazinesMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesanamorelinHydrazinesOligopeptidesAnamorelinBody weight lossCancer cachexiaGastric cancer

Identifiers

PMID40627291
PMCPMC12378834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.