SynthesisPrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2025
Brief Drug Interventions Delivered in General Medical Settings: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cannabis Use Outcomes.
Synthesis in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evidence-based atlas of risk and protective factors for psychotic disorders: an umbrella review to inform personalized prognosis and prevention.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026Article
- The effectiveness of psychological interventions delivered by health professionals for adult cannabis use in community settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is consistent evidence that brief interventions can be effective in preventing and reducing alcohol use, but support for their effects on illicit drug use is more limited. This meta-analysis expands prior research by testing whether brief drug interventions (BDIs) delivered in general medical settings reduce cannabis consumption and severity across post-intervention follow-up periods and explores potential heterogeneity in these effects. Findings from 17 randomized controlled trials were synthesized to compare short- and long-term cannabis use outcomes between intervention and control groups. Mixed effects meta-regression models were estimated to examine variability in effects across four intervention characteristics: booster session delivery, delivery setting, intervention target, and target population. Sensitivity tests were also conducted for both main effects and moderation analyses. There was no evidence that BDIs yielded significant short-term reductions in cannabis use (OR = 1.20, 95% CI [0.90, 1.62]), consumption level (g = 0.01, 95% CI [- 0.07, 0.09]), or severity (g = 0.13, 95% CI [- 0.07, 0.33]). Similarly, there was no evidence of effects on long-term cannabis use (OR = 1.19, 95% CI [0.73, 1.86]) or consumption level (g = 0.04, 95% CI [- 0.05, 0.12]). Although the primary analyses did not provide evidence of effect moderation, sensitivity tests revealed BDIs delivered in emergency departments evidenced small but significant reductions in long-term cannabis consumption levels. While these findings do not provide support for the overall effectiveness of BDIs on cannabis consumption or severity in general medical settings, they offer suggestive evidence that BDIs may perform more favorably when delivered in emergency departments. Thus, high-quality trials evaluating the effects of BDIs in emergency departments are needed. Given the importance of preventing adverse health outcomes and consequences of cannabis use, more research is needed to improve and evaluate BDI outcomes. Further, developing and testing alternative prevention and intervention approaches are essential to comprehensively address cannabis use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.