ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2025
Implementation Strategies to Address Cardiometabolic Disparities in Black Men: Lessons from Existing Research and Future Directions.
Review in Current diabetes reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diabetes and Suicide Risk Among Black Males, Including Sexual Minority Males: A Narrative Review With Primary Care Implications.Current diabetes reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
purposeBlack men in the United States experience a disproportionate burden of cardiometabolic diseases, including type 2 diabetes (T2DM), hypertension, and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Despite these disparities, existing interventions often fail to address the shared risk factors, structural determinants, and implementation barriers that impact engagement and sustainability. This review applies implementation science frameworks to evaluate strategies for improving cardiometabolic interventions tailored to Black men. RECENT
findingsCommunity-based interventions, culturally tailored health education programs, and peer-led models have demonstrated success in improving cardiometabolic outcomes for Black men. However, challenges such as medical mistrust, underrepresentation in research, and systemic barriers continue to limit their reach and sustainability. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) identifies multi-level barriers and facilitators, the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework assesses intervention impact, and the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications for Evidence-Based Interventions (FRAME-IS) highlights equity-driven adaptations. Applying implementation science frameworks provides structured insights into optimizing interventions for Black men by addressing barriers across patient, provider, and system levels. Key facilitators include culturally relevant adaptations, an inclusive healthcare workforce, and trusted community partnerships. Future research should integrate equity-focused implementation strategies to improve adoption, engagement, and long-term sustainability of cardiometabolic interventions for Black men.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.