ArticleEcoHealth2025
Genetic Characterization of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Isolated from Captive Zoo Animals.
Article in EcoHealth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- First Report ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Zoonotic tuberculosis is a neglected subject that has the potential to impede the effectiveness of the TB elimination program. The present study aimed to determine the genetic diversity and drug resistance in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from captive wild animals. A total of 67 tissue samples were collected from 33 animals, comprising 21 wild captive animals from various species and 12 slaughtered domestic buffaloes. These samples were subjected to the detection of Mycobacterial species by culture isolation, and further molecular identification by mPCR, Xpert-Ultra and TrueNat MTB/Rif assay; followed by drug susceptibility profiling by MTBDRplus and Spoligotyping of the isolates. Of the 67 samples from captive zoo animals, 44 samples were culture positive. Of these, 38 isolates were identified as Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex (MTBC) and remaining 6 were identified as non- tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). All NTM isolates were from different tissues of a Tigress which also had mixed infection with MTBC. All the 38 culture isolates were further subjected to phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST) and genotyping. Twenty-eight (73.69%) of them, were pan-susceptible, 9 (23.68%) exhibited isoniazid mono-resistance, and 1 (2.63%) was rifampicin mono-resistant. On genotyping, 27 (71.05%) of the samples were classified as 'Orphan'. Ten (26.32%) isolates were identified as CAS1_DELHI, clustered within SIT number 375, while one sample (2.63%) remained unidentified. The drug resistance and genotyping patterns were similar to the human population. Our results show that M. tuberculosis was major cause of Zoonotic TB and should be considered as potential reverse zoonotic agent in India.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40627241What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.