SynthesisNeuroradiology2025
Prognostic value of cerebral venous outflow profiles for outcomes prediction following reperfusion therapy in acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Revisiting infarct core assessment: venous outflow and net water uptake as modifiers of outcome after stroke thrombectomy.European radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecent studies have suggested that favorable venous outflow (VO) may be a promising imaging biomarker to predict clinical outcomes following reperfusion therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO).
methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, WOS, and Cochrane to identify studies that evaluated VO profiles, assessed using the Cortical Vein Opacification Score (COVES). The risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the outcomes, including functional independence, assessed by modified rankin scale at 90 days (mRS 0-2), hemorrhagic infarction, parenchymal hematoma, 90-day mortality, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and symptomatic ICH (sICH), were calculated and analyzed using the 'meta' package in R version 4.4.1.
resultsA total of six studies encompassing 2249 patients were included. Patients with favorable VO had a higher likelihood of achieving functional independence at 90 days (RR = 2.15; 95% CI: 1.35, 3.42; p = 0.01) and a lower incidence of 90-day mortality (RR = 0.39; 95% CI: 0.30, 0.51; p < 0.01), parenchymal hematoma (RR = 0.36; 95% CI: 0.27, 0.47; p < 0.01). Furthermore, sICH was less frequent in patients with favorable VO (RR = 0.39; 95% CI: 0.17, 0.89; p = 0.03). However, hemorrhagic infarction and any ICH did not differ significantly between the two groups (p-values: 0.06 and 0.32, respectively).
conclusionVO is a promising imaging biomarker for predicting outcomes in patients with AIS-LVO following reperfusion therapy. Prospective clinical trials are warranted to investigate the predictive value of VO, assessed on multiphasic computed tomography angiography (CTA), as a prognostic marker in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.