ReviewPediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2026
Technicalities, current evidence, and clinical indications of hemoadsorption in critically ill children.
Review in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hemoadsorptionin Critically Ill Pediatric Oncology and Hemato-Oncology Patients: A Systematic Review with Structured Narrative Synthesis.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Hemoadsorption in acute pediatric carbamazepine intoxication: a case report and systematic review of extracorporeal therapies.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Review
- Integration of Polymyxin-B Hemoadsorption Device into a CRRT Circuit for Endotoxic Septic Shock in a Child: A Case Report.Pediatric reports · 2026Article
- First experience of hemadsorption with HA60 cartridges in newborns and small infants with septic shock: a case series.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hemoadsorption devices represent a significant advancement in extracorporeal organ support therapies, enabling the targeted removal of molecules that are not cleared by conventional kidney replacement therapies. Several hemoadsorption devices are currently available, each with distinct characteristics, mechanisms of action, and molecular adsorption profiles that enable their targeted use in a broad range of clinical scenarios in critically ill patients. Their application has recently been explored in pediatric patients with conditions such as septic shock, acute liver failure, hyperinflammatory syndromes, rhabdomyolysis, and intoxications. Preliminary findings suggest both clinical and biochemical improvements, including reduction in severity scores and circulating inflammatory mediators. However, the current body of evidence remains limited, primarily consisting of case reports and small case series, and often lacks robust clinical trial data. In the pediatric population, several challenges persist, including concerns about device sizing, the unintended removal of essential substances, such as medications, nutrients, albumin, and fibrinogen, and the procedural invasiveness, particularly for younger children. Future research should focus on patient stratification to identify those most likely to benefit from hemoadsorption, and on conducting large, multicenter studies to validate its effectiveness and utility in the pediatric setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40627187What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.