ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Exploring behavioural motivations of treatment refusal in cancer: a Q-methodological approach.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCancer treatment refusal is known to lower survival rates and increase cancer symptoms in individuals with cancer. Behavioural motivations of treatment refusal need to be elucidated for better cancer care. Using Q-methodology, a mixed methods research approach, we explored behavioural motivations of treatment refusal in individuals diagnosed with cancer.
methodThirty-nine individuals (n = 39; age = 49.2 ± 12.2 years) were recruited from Australia, the UK, and the USA, who had refused cancer treatment within the past decade. Participants completed an online demographic questionnaire and a Q-sort activity which required the organisation and ranking of 44 statements on potential treatment refusal motivations. Q-sort data were analysed with an inverted factor analysis. Compositive Q-sorts, distinguishing statements, and demographic data facilitated interpretation of the resulting factors.
resultsEight factors, accounting for 66% of total variance, were identified and interpreted. The eight factors were as follows: (1) I was not motivated by my health status, (2) Treatment was too risky for how unwell I was, (3) I was motivated by my age, (4) I did not distrust the medical system and practitioners, (5) Religious and spiritual practices would heal me, (6) I was influenced by my religious and spiritual beliefs, (7) My prognosis was not good enough, and (8) I wanted to heal naturally.
conclusionDiverse motivations for cancer treatment refusal were found, which could help practitioners understand an individual's considerations regarding treatment decisions. Future research should investigate motivations underpinning cancer treatment refusal and establish person-centred strategies to address concerns when promoting evidence-based cancer treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.