Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40627174›Full record

ArticleJournal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie2026

2D-to-3D: Predicting three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric measurements from two conventional X-ray images : From 2D to 3D with a computational tool without using computed tomography.

Abhishek Gupta, Shailendra Singh Rana, Sharvari Vichare

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Abhishek GuptaCSIR-Central Scientific Instruments Organisation (CSIO), Sector 30, 160030, Chandigarh, India. abhishekgupta@csio.res.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8592-9964
Shailendra Singh RanaDepartment of Dentistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Bathinda, Punjab, India. rana.shailu0612@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9513-329X
Sharvari VichareDepartment of Dentistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Bathinda, Punjab, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of computed tomography (CT) or cone-beam CT (CBCT) enables three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric analysis but exposes patients to high levels of radiation, while conventional X‑ray imaging provides projected measurements for two-dimensional (2D) cephalometric analysis with lower radiation exposure. The presented tool overcomes the disadvantages of both imaging modalities for performing 3D cephalometric analysis. Our tool aims to evolve a 3D framework from the fusion of conventional lateral and posteroanterior (PA) X‑ray images for performing 3D cephalometric analysis. Lateral and PA image datasets of 27 patients were used to validate the proposed tool. A total of 29 cephalometric landmarks were plotted on each image, and therefore, a total of 406 measurements were computed on each patient's image. An image registration-based method was implemented using the MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA) programming language for the prediction of 3D landmarks and computation of cephalometric measurements. The same 406 measurements were compared with measurements made on corresponding CT images. Statistical parameters, e.g., average error, standard deviation, t‑test, and correlation coefficient were computed to evaluate the performance of the proposed tool. The average mean error and average standard deviation of the 406 measurements were 2.40 and 1.77 mm, respectively. Using the proposed tool, a 3D cephalometric analysis can be performed using two X‑ray images, avoiding the need for CT/CBCT images. The proposed tool is the first method to evolve 3D cephalometric landmarks and measurements from two conventional X‑ray images, and the overall results were satisfactory.

Indexed as

CephalometryImaging, Three-DimensionalRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRadiography, DentalTomography, X-Ray ComputedAlgorithmsAnatomic LandmarksCone-Beam Computed TomographyFemaleHumansMaleRadiographic Image EnhancementReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySubtraction TechniqueLateral X‑ray imagesPosteroanterior X‑ray imageRegistrationThree-dimensional cephalometric analysisThree-dimensional cephalometric landmarks

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.