ArticleJournal of religion and health2025
Assessing the Reliability of Combined Scales for Spirituality Perception and Web Course Learning Adaptation among Chinese Undergraduate Nursing Students.
Article in Journal of religion and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spiritual care aims to address the requirements of the human spirit in times of trauma, disease, or grief. The purpose of this study is to examine the internal consistency and construct validity of the Spiritual Cognition Scale for Chinese context when applied with the Online Course Learning Adaptation Scale among the nursing undergraduates. A total of 228 research samples were included in this quantitative, cross-sectional study, which utilized a 1:5 standard and accounted for a 20% loss. The participants involved were nursing undergraduates with good communication, normal cognition, and willingness to participate in the study; they did not participate in other similar studies during the study period. The C-SCGS was used to assess the spiritual consciousness of nursing undergraduates. In this study, 228 questionnaires were administered, and all the administered questionnaires were retrieved hence the recovery rate was 100%. Of these, 171 were valid questionnaires, which makes the effective response rate 75%. The KMO and Bartlet tests were carried out on the data obtained from the nursing students. According to the results, the KMO value of the Chinese version of Spiritual Cognition Scale was 0. 85, and Bartlett's sphere test was found to be statistically significant (χ2 = 1365. 23, P < 0. 001). It has been found that Cronbach's α of the Chinese version of the Spirituality Cognition Scale was 0. 944, which means that the scale had a satisfactory level of reliability when used on nursing students. These results suggest that the C-SCGS is a reliable tool for assessing Chinese nursing undergraduate students' attitudes toward spirituality and spiritual care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40627126What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.