ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2025
Impact of a Multi-site Peer-led, Storytelling-based Workshop to Teach Resident Physicians About Healing After Medical Errors.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdverse psychological effects after medical errors are common, especially amongst residents.
aimOur aim was to evaluate the impact of a single workshop on resident comfort with, skills, and behavior change after medical error. SETTING AND
participantsPGY1 Internal Medicine residents at two residency programs. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: We used constructivism to design a peer-led, storytelling-based workshop with semi-structured small group reflections. Surveys based on Kirkpatrick's framework were given pre- and post-workshop and one site conducted a 1-year follow up survey. PROGRAM EVALUATION: In 2023, 68 residents completed the workshop and survey, for a response rate of 90.1% (68/73). There was an increase in self-reported skills around recognizing (41% pre-, 75% post-, p = 0.001) and overcoming (37% pre-, 76% post-, p < 0.001) the effects of being involved in medical errors. A 1-year follow up survey, response rate 76% (25/33), found 71% (17/24) of residents felt somewhat/very prepared to respond to the emotional impact of errors on others, 13/24 (54%) felt their response changed due to the single medical error workshop they attended. Content analysis found that change occurred through normalizing errors and empowering discussion. DISCUSSION: A single peer-led storytelling-based workshop can increase resident comfort with and understanding of the effects of medical errors on physicians with lasting effect, and promote coping with, and healing from, these events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.