ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2025
Breast Cancer Information Grand Round for Survivorship (BIG-S) prospective cohort.
Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Existing evidence indicates that long-term effects of breast cancer treatment can significantly impact survivors' ability to fulfill their personal, familial, and social roles. However, few studies comprehensively integrate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and real-world healthcare utilization data, particularly in Asian populations. Thus, we established a prospective cohort, the Breast Cancer Information Grand Round for Survivorship (BIG-S), to address these gaps and introduce this resource. The prospective BIG-S cohort recruited patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer at Samsung Medical Center starting in November 2018. Clinical data, recurrence, and healthcare utilization were systematically collected from electronic medical records by trained researchers, and body composition was measured using multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis. PROs were assessed following recommendations from the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM). These included health-related quality of life, physical, psychological, social, and cognitive functions, symptoms, healthy behaviors, financial difficulty, spiritual well-being, and cancer adaptation, using validated questionnaires. A total of 2,749 patients participated, with an average age of 49.7 years. The mean quality-of-life score at diagnosis was 55.6, indicating moderate general well-being, and improved gradually to 68.2 at four years post-diagnosis. At baseline, participants showed high physical, cognitive, and role functioning scores but had relatively lower emotional and social functioning scores. Over four years, emotional and social functioning improved, whereas cognitive and role functioning declined. Survivors initially reported low sexual functioning, sexual enjoyment, and future perspectives, all of which significantly decreased during follow-up. Fatigue and insomnia were persistent throughout the observation period. Healthcare utilization initially concentrated on plastic surgery and rehabilitation medicine and increasingly shifted towards gynecology, family medicine, and psychiatry after two years. The BIG-S cohort uniquely integrates clinical data, PROs, and healthcare utilization patterns, offering comprehensive insights into breast cancer survivorship trajectories. Findings from BIG-S are expected to guide targeted interventions and inform tailored survivorship care strategies, especially for Asian breast cancer survivors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.