Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40627041›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2025

Forensic shotgun pellet examination - material detection with dual-energy computed tomography.

Mikael Brix, Juho-Antti Junno, Eveliina Lammentausta, Alina Junno, Timo Liimatainen, Jaakko Niinimäki, Juha Kiljunen, Petteri Oura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mikael BrixDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Oulu University Hospital, Kajaanintie 50, Oulu, FI-90220, Finland. mikael.brix@pohde.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4646-6714
Juho-Antti JunnoDepartment of Archaeology, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 8000, Oulu, FI-90014, Finland. juho-antti.junno@oulu.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0481-6958
Eveliina LammentaustaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Oulu University Hospital, Kajaanintie 50, Oulu, FI-90220, Finland.
Alina JunnoDepartment of Archaeology, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 8000, Oulu, FI-90014, Finland.
Timo LiimatainenDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Oulu University Hospital, Kajaanintie 50, Oulu, FI-90220, Finland.
Jaakko NiinimäkiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Oulu University Hospital, Kajaanintie 50, Oulu, FI-90220, Finland.
Juha KiljunenForensic Laboratory, Firearms Investigations, National Bureau of Investigation, P.O. Box 285, Vantaa, FI-01301, Finland.
Petteri OuraResearch Unit of Health Sciences and Technology, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, P.O. Box 8000, Oulu, FI-90014, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forensic shotgun wounds are relatively common worldwide. Shotguns are used for legal purposes such as hunting as well as for criminal activities. In addition, shotguns are used by military and law enforcement. Even though shotguns are often lethal from close distances, shotgun wounds require medical attention regardless of the shooting distance. As a result, patients with shotgun wounds are often treated in hospitals, and in lethal incidents, they are examined by forensic pathologists. Radiological imaging, computed tomography (CT) in particular, may constitute a part of the shotgun wound examination in both scenarios. CT may help to identify and locate the pellets and aid in wound characterization. It would be important to detect the pellet material as lead pellets, for example, are heavily toxic, and others, such as steel pellets may, as ferromagnetic, prevent some further imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging from being employed. In this study, we wanted to experiment whether shotgun pellet material could be detected with radiological imaging utilizing dual-energy CT (DECT). Traditionally pellets are manufactured from heavily toxic lead, but due to environmental factors, other pellet materials such as steel, copper, tungsten, and bismuth are getting more and more popular. To conduct this study, various pellet materials were shot into ballistic gelatine blocks. The blocks then underwent DECT. Subsequently, each pellet was automatically segmented, and for these extracted pellets a dual-energy index (DEI) was computed. DEI values of the pellets were compared to determine whether this measure could be used to differentiate between the pellet materials. The DEI values (mean ± standard deviation) were 0.212 ± 0.006, 0.008 ± 0.001, 0.187 ± 0.002, 0.012 ± 0.004, and 0.008 ± 0.002 for steel, lead, copper, tungsten, and bismuth, respectively. The Wilcoxon rank sum test indicated that steel and copper pellets could be reliably differentiated from the other pellet materials. Our study demonstrated that DECT can reliably differentiate steel and copper shotgun pellets from other materials such as lead, tungsten, and bismuth. This capability may provide important additional information in medico-legal investigations and aid trauma centres treating patients with shotgun wounds.

Indexed as

Foreign BodiesForensic BallisticsTomography, X-Ray ComputedWounds, GunshotBismuthCopperGelatinHumansLeadSteelTungstenBismuthCopperGelatinLeadSteelTungsten

Identifiers

PMID40627041
PMCPMC12532739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.