ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2025
A fully automated deep learning framework for age estimation in adults using periapical radiographs of canine teeth.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- First-stage assessment of AI-based anatomical measurement accuracy for the Cameriere European dental age estimation method.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Age and sex estimation using post-mortem CT scout view.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based method for estimating age from periapical radiographs of upper incisors in a Thai population.Imaging science in dentistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Determining age from dental remains is vital in forensic investigations, aiding in victim identification and anthropological research. Our framework uses a two-step pipeline: tooth detection followed by age estimation, based on either canine tooth images alone or combined with sex information. The dataset included 2,587 radiographs from 1,004 patients (691 females, 313 males) aged 13.42-85.45 years. The YOLOv8-Nano model achieved exceptional performance in detecting canine teeth, with an F1 score of 0.994, a 98.94% detection success rate, and accurate numbering of all detected teeth. For age estimation, we implemented four convolutional neural network architectures: ResNet-18, DenseNet-121, EfficientNet-B0, and MobileNetV3. Each model was trained to estimate age based on one of the four individual canine teeth (13, 23, 33, and 43). The models achieved median absolute errors ranging from 3.55 to 5.18 years. Incorporating sex as an additional input feature did not improve performance. Moreover, no significant differences in predictive accuracy were observed among the individual teeth. In conclusion, the proposed framework demonstrates potential as a robust and practical tool for forensic age estimation across diverse forensic contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40627040What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.