ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Functional outcomes in depressed skull fractures: the role of surgical timing and perioperative clinical radiological predictors.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDepressed skull fractures (DSFs) are features of traumatic brain injury (TBI), frequently associated with intracranial damage and long-term functional impairments. The neurological outcomes of the perioperative management are yet to be evaluated. This study aimed to assess the effect of surgical timing and perioperative clinical radiological factors on functional outcomes in DSFs.
methodsThis prospective cohort study enrolled 205 patients with DSFs at a tertiary neurosurgical center in Uganda. Patients underwent surgical management, with the primary exposure variable being surgical timing (≤ 48 h vs. >48 h). Functional outcomes at six months were assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE), categorized into favorable (GOSE 5-8) and unfavorable (GOSE 1-4). Multivariate regression models were used to identify functional outcome predictors.
resultsThe median-age was 24 years (IQR = 15-31), 89.5% were male, and 49.73% were assault victims. Approximately 73.1% had an admission GCS > 13. The frontal bone was most commonly involved (46.2%). Early surgical intervention (≤ 48 h) significantly reduced the risk of surgical site infections (SSIs) (p = 0.01) and shortened hospital stays. However, surgical timing had no significant association with functional outcomes {adjusted risk ratio (ARR): 0.95; 95%CI: 0.35-2.61; p = 0.92}. Several perioperative factors were strongly linked to unfavorable outcomes, including ASA class 3 (ARR: 5.09, 95%CI: 2.11-12.2; p < 0.01), compound DSFs (ARR: 3.18; 95%CI: 1.70-5.96; p < 0.01), and midline shift ≥ 5 mm (ARR: 2.84; 95%CI: 1.50-5.39; p < 0.01).
conclusionsEarly surgery of DSFs reduces the infection rates and hospital length of stay; however, it does not significantly impact the 6-months functional outcomes. The outcomes are instead influenced significantly by clinical radiological perioperative factors such as the ASA classification, compound type, midline shift ≥ 5 mm, and others. We advocate for an aggressive treatment for increased ICP to improve the outcomes, and an early surgical intervention for infection reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40627030What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.