ArticleEuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology2025
Four-year durability of the Myval balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve.
Article in EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contemporary Management of Aortic Stenosis: Timing of Intervention and Lifetime Valve Management.European journal of clinical investigation · 2026Review
- Three-Year Follow-Up of the First 100 Patients Treated with the Balloon-Expandable Myval Transcatheter Aortic Valve System: A Single-Centre Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The new balloon-expandable Myval transcatheter heart valve: only good news?EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Myval series is the first commercially available balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) system designed as an alternative to the SAPIEN series. The LANDMARK trial recently demonstrated its non-inferiority compared to contemporary systems. However, the long-term durability of the Myval series remains unknown.
aimsWe aimed to evaluate the 4-year durability of the Myval series using Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3-defined endpoints.
methodsWe carried out a multicentre ambispective study of patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent TAVI with the Myval series between December 2017 and April 2020. Baseline characteristics were prospectively recorded in a dedicated database. Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was performed at 4 years. Outcomes included haemodynamic valve deterioration (HVD), bioprosthetic valve failure (BVF), and patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) as defined by the VARC-3 criteria, assessed at a central echocardiography laboratory.
resultsA total of 366 patients from 9 institutions were included, all of whom completed 4-year follow-up or were followed up until death. The 4-year survival rate was 81.8%, with residual ≥moderate aortic regurgitation observed in 9.2% of patients. BVF criterion 1 (symptomatic valve failure) occurred in 3.3%, while no cases of BVF criteria 2 or 3 were reported. Stage 2 HVD was observed in 9.7% of patients and stage 3 HVD in 0.7% at 4 years. Moderate and severe PPM were identified in 3.6% and 2.1% of patients at 1 year, respectively.
conclusionsIn a real-world cohort, 4-year outcomes with the balloon-expandable Myval series demonstrated acceptable valve durability, low haemodynamic deterioration, and comparable performance to contemporary TAVI systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.