Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40627004›Full record

ReviewEuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology2025

Current and future applications of robotics in structural heart interventions.

Xiang Chen, Giulio Russo, Mi Chen, Zhu Da, Xiangbin Pan, Yan Wang, Edwin Ho, Emiliano Votta, Paolo Denti, Didier Tchétché and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Xiang ChenXiamen Cardiovascular Hospital, Xiamen, China.
Giulio RussoDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, Cardiology Unit, Policlinico Tor Vergata, University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Mi ChenFuwai Yunnan Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Affiliated Cardiovascular Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Zhu DaFuwai Yunnan Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Affiliated Cardiovascular Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Xiangbin PanFuwai Yunnan Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Affiliated Cardiovascular Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Yan WangXiamen Cardiovascular Hospital, Xiamen, China.
Edwin HoDivision of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Emiliano VottaDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Paolo DentiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Cardiac Surgery, San Raffaele University Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Didier TchétchéCardiology Department, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France.
Azeem LatibDivision of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Maurizio TaramassoHerzZentrum Hirslanden, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotics entered the cardiovascular field in the late 1990s with a robot-assisted coronary artery bypass graft. Since then, the use of robots has become a common part of cardiovascular surgery in several types of interventions. The experience in transcatheter interventions has been slower, and the application of robotics to percutaneous coronary interventions has shown some encouraging results but also some technical limitations. Following the growth of structural heart interventions, attention has recently switched to the potential application of robotics in this field. So far, several cases have been performed in animal models and only a few cases in humans. The opportunity to perform a procedure (almost) without any X-ray exposure or lead garments is extremely attractive, especially for operators. Alongside these, there are several further potential advantages, but there are also many challenges to overcome. The integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning in the near future might further contribute to improve the performance of future generations of robots. In this review, the current and future applications of robotics in structural heart interventions and transoesophageal echocardiography will be discussed, together with the potential advantages, challenges and future perspectives.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresAnimalsCardiac CatheterizationEchocardiography, TransesophagealHumansPercutaneous Coronary Intervention

Identifiers

PMID40627004
PMCPMC12207339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.