Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40626811›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2025

Function over form: The temporal evolution of affordance-based scene categorization.

Michelle R Greene, Bruce C Hansen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Making models disagree to learn how brains compute.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michelle R GreeneBarnard College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Bruce C HansenColgate University, Hamilton, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans can rapidly understand and categorize scenes, yet the specific features and mechanisms that enable categorization remain debated. Here, we investigated whether affordances-the possible actions a scene supports-facilitate scene categorization even when other similarly informative features are present. In Experiment 1, we generated triplets of images that were equally dissimilar on one feature dimension (affordances, materials, surfaces) but similar on the remaining two. Using an odd-one-out task, observers consistently chose the image that differed in its affordances as the outlier despite equally large differences in the other dimensions. In Experiment 2, we asked whether shared affordances also interfere with rapid categorization. When distractors shared affordances rather than surface features with a target category, observers committed significantly more false alarms, indicating that functional similarity creates stronger competition during scene categorization. Finally, in Experiment 3, we recorded ERPs to examine the time course of category representations. We used multivariate decoding to assess the quality of scene category representations. We found that both affordance- and surface-similar distractors yielded above-chance decoding starting around 60-70 ms after stimulus. However, the neural discriminability of target categories was reduced in the affordance-similar condition, starting around 150 ms. These findings suggest that affordances carry a privileged status in scene perception, shaping both behavioral category performance and neural processing.

Indexed as

Form PerceptionPattern Recognition, VisualAdultAttentionElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationReaction TimeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40626811
PMCPMC12248959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.